‘Smart lighting’ might make vertical farming more affordable

News

HomeHome / News / ‘Smart lighting’ might make vertical farming more affordable

Oct 14, 2024

‘Smart lighting’ might make vertical farming more affordable

The indoor farming technique saves water and space but currently is energy intensive Vertical farms like the one shown grow crops indoors in stacks under artificial lights. Though this type of farming

The indoor farming technique saves water and space but currently is energy intensive

Vertical farms like the one shown grow crops indoors in stacks under artificial lights. Though this type of farming saves water and space, it is energy intensive.

JohnnyGreig/E+/Getty Images Plus

By Sophie Hartley

September 24, 2024 at 5:00 am

Fiddling with the dimmer switch might help some indoor farmers curb one of their biggest challenges: soaring electricity costs.

Growing crops in stacked rows indoors under fixed-intensity artificial lights can produce more food per square foot while using less land and water than traditional outdoor farms. But this vertical farming technique is also energy intensive and expensive (SN: 9/26/08). Now, researchers have designed a computer program that controls lighting to optimize both photosynthesis and electric bills. Described September 24 in Frontiers in Science, the computer program adjusts the intensity of grow lights hourly based on the changing cost of electricity.

Help us improve by taking our 15-question reader survey.

This “smart lighting” could potentially cut vertical farms’ electricity costs by up to 12 percent, says Leo Marcelis, a horticulturist at Wageningen University in the Netherlands. That could save some farms tens of thousands of dollars annually, according to the 2021 Global CEA Census Report — a survey of the indoor and controlled environment agriculture industry — and Marcellis’ own projections.

But how might indoor crops fare under dynamic lighting? Marcelis and colleagues tested how leafy greens such as basil, spinach and arugula reacted to light patterns that changed hourly. One group of plants grew under high- then low-intensity lighting intervals. Another group grew under light that was more intense in the morning and dimmer in the afternoon. Both groups’ mature weight and leaf area — which can determine a plant’s value in the supermarket — were about the same as plants grown under fixed intensity lights.

The new computer program didn’t determine the experimental lighting conditions, but the team now knows that indoor farms have room to save on electricity. Continued research that tests dynamic lighting on larger scales is needed, Marcelis says. He plans to continue experimenting with how much dynamic lighting indoor crops can handle.

The study “seems to be a very good proposal to start more research,” says Fatemeh Sheibani, a plant physiologist at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. But she emphasizes that the work is preliminary, and that dynamic lighting is “not a near-term benefit for vertical farming.”

Questions or comments on this article? E-mail us at [email protected] | Reprints FAQ

E. Kaiser et al. Vertical farming goes dynamic: optimizing resource use efficiency, product quality, and energy costs. Frontiers in Science. Published online September 24, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fsci.2024.1411259.

WayBeyond & Agriculture Consulting. 2021 Global CEA Census Report. Published online December 1, 2021.

Sophie Hartley is a Fall 2024 science writing intern at Science News. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Comparative Human Development and Creative Writing from the University of Chicago and a master’s degree in science writing from MIT.

We are at a critical time and supporting climate journalism is more important than ever. Science News and our parent organization, the Society for Science, need your help to strengthen environmental literacy and ensure that our response to climate change is informed by science.

Pleasesubscribe to Science News and add $16 to expandscience literacy and understanding.

Tell us about your Science News experiencesupporting climate journalism is more important than ever.add $16